From: David Champion Date: 00:20 on 13 Apr 2005 Subject: HTML E-mail Not what you're thinking. > <!-- > This is a graphic email message. If you are reading this message > then your email program does not support HTML format. We recommend > upgrading the program you use to read your email. > --> Well then, pinhead, *don't put in a text part to a multipart/alternative message*. My reader understands HTML just fine, dipstick, but if you state that the two parts are equivalent, which is what multipart/alternative bloody *means*, then of course I'm going to favor the text one, you hoser. So none of this noise -- and yo, what's it doing buried inside an HTML comment anyway, peabrain, if you've concluded already that I don't dig? -- none of this noise about I need a new flaming mail reader to see your precious "content". I miss when IT departments had underpaid old curmudgeons sitting in the back room hollering that if you're gonna do this, you're gonna do it right, instead of a pile of cheap CS graduates whose best contribution to the project is finding the pull-string that makes the new manager, just hired from Pepperidge Farm or some place, go "Cool!" I mean, I'm underpaid anyway. Might as well let me have the right effect on the product.
From: peter (Peter da Silva) Date: 01:00 on 13 Apr 2005 Subject: Re: HTML E-mail Which is why my reaction to the new rumored HTML features in Mail.app in Tiger is "stercus, stercus, stercus, moriturus sum".
Generated at 10:26 on 16 Apr 2008 by mariachi